• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to footer

Technologies.org

Technology Trends: Follow the Money

  • Technology Events 2026-2027
  • Sponsored Post
  • Technology Markets
  • About
    • GDPR
  • Contact

Cloud Economics 2020: U.S. Public Companies to Implement New FASB Cloud Computing Accounting Standard

May 6, 2020 By admin

More than half of public company executives say their organizations are in the cloud now (53.9%) and an additional 25.5% say their organizations will move into it in the year ahead, according to a January 2020 Deloitte poll. Yet, just 33.7% of public company executives say their organizations have begun to implement the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) cloud computing accounting standard — mandatory for cloud-using U.S. public company financial reporting for fiscal years started on or after Dec. 15, 2019 based on current guidance.

“Before the FASB cloud accounting standard took effect, cloud service arrangement costs had an immediate impact on earnings that sometimes affected the timing of cloud investments. But, once the new standard is adopted, it should reduce immediate impact on earnings by deferring some costs that will now be recognized as assets and amortized over the period of service,” said Chris Chiriatti, Audit & Assurance managing director, Deloitte & Touche LLP. “Some companies may find that the FASB standard could help accelerate cloud investment timing by easing budgetary constraints previously posed by near-term impacts to key financing metrics. Implementing the right processes to properly identify and account for cloud related costs is critical.”

Sean Torr, Deloitte Risk & Financial Advisory managing director, Deloitte & Touche LLP added, “Because cloud computing decisions can sometimes be made fractionally across an organization, the new accounting standard is a good reason for IT and finance teams to meet and work more closely to get organized and take advantage of what the standard offers. Approaching cloud economics or cloud cost optimization without financial and IT leaders at the table may not only result in a sub-optimized economic view of a cloud deployment, but may also complicate an organization’s compliance efforts.”

More than half of public company executives (54.6%) say complying with new accounting standards was only somewhat efficient in the last 12 months, costing more time and money than initially budgeted. Another 9.3% of respondents report they had to spend significantly more resources to implement these standards, calling their efforts inefficient.

“As with any new accounting standard, early planning and teaming with all relevant business stakeholders are important factors in making implementation as efficient as possible,” continued Torr. “This is certainly a concern for public companies that are operating in the cloud and have not yet started implementation of FASB’s new cloud computing accounting standards. Moreover it’s also a concern for private entities as they work to implement this and other upcoming accounting standards in the next year or two.”

Private organizations have more time to implement, but farther to go
For private organizations, the standard is currently set to take effect for cloud-using organizations during fiscal years starting on or after Dec. 15, 2020. As such, it may not be surprising that only 13.5% of privately held organization executives report that they’ve started FASB cloud computing accounting implementation work. Poll results show cloud use by private entities is similar to that of publics with private entity executives reporting that their organizations are either already in the cloud (54.7%) or planning to move into it in the next 12 months (25.5%).

“While some public companies are already racing to play catch-up on cloud computing accounting compliance, private organizations and companies that have yet to deploy cloud solutions have the benefit of time on their side if they choose to embrace it,” said Chiriatti. “And that includes time to engineer the best cloud builds (i.e. hybrid, etc.) for their organizations’ unique technology and accounting needs.”

Questions finance, accounting, IT and other leaders can ask to help discern how prepared their organizations are to comply with the FASB cloud computing accounting standard include:

On financial performance impacts–What are the organization’s key financial performance metrics and how will cloud implementation efforts impact them? Are there cloud implementation choices that can impact metrics differently? Does the organization have hybrid solutions that include both cloud services and on premise licenses?
On cross-functional internal management–Do leaders across finance, accounting and IT have a firm understanding of the FASB cloud computing standard and how it can be most efficiently implemented? How will employees making cloud purchasing decisions be trained on the accounting requirements?
On cloud vendors and solutions–Are the organization’s cloud vendors providing sufficient information to determine how to account for cloud costs? Are cloud service provider vendors offering service options that have differing accounting implications?
On internal controls and policies—Does the organization have existing accounting processes and controls in place to evaluate and properly record cloud implementation activities?
About the online poll
More than 1,300 C-suite and other executives in publicly traded and privately held organizations were polled online during a Deloitte Center for Controllership webcast, titled “The evolution of accounting: Building a sustainable framework for the future,” on Jan. 29, 2020. Answer rates differed by question.

Source: Deloitte

Filed Under: Tech

Footer

Recent Posts

  • AltSql: An Embedded Database Engine That Syncs Devices and Gateways Without Conflicts
  • VPN Works: Uses Linux Network Namespaces to Isolate and Log Every Connection From an Agent
  • Precomputing: Materializes Dashboard Answers With SQLite Triggers as Data Arrives
  • Preconfiguration: Generates Reproducible Setup Across Multiple Cloud Platforms From One Spec
  • BareProxy: A Go Reverse Proxy That Makes Routing Decisions Explainable
  • AI Infrastructure Moves Beyond GPUs as Billions Flow Into Interconnects, Cloud, Robotics and Agent Systems
  • Supermicro Is Now Shipping NVIDIA Vera Rubin NVL72 Racks, With 1,152-GPU Scalable Units Ready to Order
  • Synopsys and TSMC Certify A14 Design Flows and Roll Out Agentic AI Chip Design Tools
  • Bird.com Secures $450M in Debt Financing and Opens Its Messaging Network to AI Agents
  • Meta AI Glasses Become the First Consumer Device to Record Dolby Atmos Audio

Media Partners

  • Market Analysis
  • BareProxy.com
  • App Coding
Screening Startup and Product Ideas After a Brainstorm: Four Questions, Money First
An AI Lab Is Paying Up Front for Atlas Energy’s (AESI) Generators as Agentic AI Multiplies Token Demand
Oracle’s Force Majeure Notice on Project Jupiter Shows Where AI Data Center Risk Is Landing
AI Infrastructure Credit Costs Rise as CoreWeave-Tied Bonds Price at 9.25% and China Chipmaker Profits Jump 620%
OpenAI and Anthropic Cut AI Model Prices as $1.75B in Funding Flows to Data, Security and Infrastructure
Semiconductor Revenue Hits Record $425B in Q2 2026, but Omdia’s $500B Q3 Forecast Implies Growth Halves
AI Extinction Warnings Went Global in Six Days. Nothing in the Technology Changed.
Anthropic Walks Away From $6 Billion Decart Acquisition: The Deal Was About Inference Cost, Not World Models
VR Status Report 2026: Quest Sales Keep Falling While Smart Glasses Take the Money
The Case That the US Can Grow Out of $40 Trillion in Debt: Three Conditions the Clinton Surpluses Actually Met
BareProxy 0.1 Alpha Adds Plan, Apply and Rollback
Introducing BareProxy, the Web Server and Reverse Proxy That Explains Itself
BareProxy Serves Hugo and Other Static Sites Straight From a Folder
How BareProxy Plan Shows What a Config Change Will Do Before It Goes Live
One Record per Request: How BareProxy Tracing Works
BareProxy Modules: Eight Add-Ons Around a Bare Core
Why BareProxy Routes on the Same Path It Forwards
About
Config Reference
Contact
A Background Job Queue in One SQLite File Covers What Most Apps Deploy Redis For
A Database Where Every Value Remembers Its Source, Confidence and Extraction Time
A Feature Store Small Enough to Embed: Point-in-Time Reads for Local and Edge ML
A Schema Diff That Warns Which Migration Will Lock a 40-Million-Row Table or Lose Data
A Single-File Log Database: Pipe Logs In, Query Them With SQL, Hand the File to Anyone
A Telemetry Database That Forgets on Purpose Keeps Rollups and Anomalies Instead of Raw Rows
A Tiny SQL Engine for JSON Streams Fits Between jq and a Stream Processing Cluster
An Embedded Sketch Database: Billions of Events, Megabytes of Storage, Error Bars on Every Answer
An Embedded Workflow Engine With Five Primitives: Trigger, Condition, Action, Wait and Retry
An Evidence Graph Built From Extracted Claims Keeps Contradictions Attached to Their Sources

Media Partners

  • AltSql.com
  • Technology Conferences
  • API Coding
AltSql Is a Native Hybrid of Key-Value and SQL, From the Sensor to the Gateway
AltSql Core and AltSql DB Are Now Open Source Under the Apache License 2.0
Introduction
AltSql DB 0.3 Adds Secondary Indexes and Statement Savepoints: A Lookup on a Million Rows Ran 198 Times Faster Than a Full Scan
How It Works
AltSql DB 0.2: SQL and Direct Calls Wrote Byte-Identical Files Over 100,000 Random Steps
AltSql DB Keeps a Whole Fleet in One File and Reads by Key 5 Times Faster Than SQLite Through SQL
AltSql Core and Six Prototypes Built Around It
AltSql Ask Puts One SQL Question to 500 Simulated Machines and Brings Back Only the Answers
Machine Monitoring Case Study: Overheat Alarm Handled on the Sensor While Wi-Fi Was Down
Cloudflare Connect 2026, October 19–21, Moscone West, San Francisco
JNUC 2026, September 23–25, Kansas City Convention Center, Kansas City
Startup World Cup Grand Finale 2026, November 4–6, Hilton San Francisco Union Square, San Francisco
FYUZ 2026, November 3–5, The Westin Seattle, Seattle
ONUG AI Networking Summit 2026, October 28–29, Penn District, New York
Networking Field Day 2026, October 6–9, San Jose
Nova Future Summit 2026, September 28–30, Napa
Breakbulk Americas 2026, September 22–23, George R. Brown Convention Center, Houston
Gartner CIO & IT Executive Conference 2026, September 21–23, Sheraton São Paulo WTC Hotel, São Paulo
ITC Vegas 2026, September 29–October 1, Mandalay Bay, Las Vegas
A Tiny ETL Binary Competes With curl, jq and SQLite in a Cron Job, So Build It That Small
An AI Agent Flight Recorder Belongs in One Portable File, the Way HAR Did It for HTTP
Benchmarking MCP Servers and Stateful API Workflows: Latency, Throughput and Tokens per Call
Diagnose a Slow API From One Request: DNS, Connect, TLS, Server Wait and Transfer
Finding API Endpoints, Tables and Flags Nobody Uses Takes Code and Traffic Together
Fuzzing MCP Servers: Generate Bad Arguments From the Tool Schema and Watch What Breaks
Give Any API a History: Poll It, Hash It and Query Old Versions With SQL
Infer Your API's Real Contract From Traffic, Then Diff It Against the Docs
Keeping Third-Party API Responses in SQLite Gets You a Cache, an Offline Mode and a History
LLM Response Caching Pays Off in CI, Evals and Agent Retries, Not in Chat

Copyright © 2026 Technologies.org

Media Partners: Market Analysis · Market Research · Referently · Photography